Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Files

Comments

BlackseAkelarre Studio

Quizá mi problema con Cioran es que concede al pesimismo un privilegio que no estoy seguro de que posea. Si toda visión del mundo es una construcción humana, entonces el pesimismo radical también lo es. No veo por qué habría de ser más verdadero que otras formas de interpretar la existencia. Entiendo su idea: la lucidez erosiona las ficciones que sostienen la vida. Pero incluso si acepto eso, no veo que la conclusión obligatoria sea la desesperación. Una vez descubres que ciertos significados son construcciones, sigues pudiendo decidir cuáles merecen ser habitados. Tal vez ahí difiero de él. Siempre he otorgado mucha agencia al individuo. No niego el peso de las emociones ni de los condicionamientos, pero tampoco creo que estemos condenados a ser sus prisioneros. Y luego está la naturaleza. Cuando observo un metro cuadrado de suelo veo cientos de formas de vida interactuando. Un pájaro, una lombriz, un mosquito, una bacteria... todos hacen cosas. Cosas análogas, reveladoras, poderosas. No porque respondan a una pregunta metafísica, sino porque muestran cómo funciona el mundo. De ahí extraigo paciencia, serenidad, recursos y perspectiva. Por eso me cuesta hablar de un mundo vacío. Puede existir una filosofía del vacío. Puede existir una experiencia humana del vacío. Pero el mundo que observo está saturado de relaciones, procesos e historias. Que no comprendamos toda esa complejidad es un gran hándicap. Pero que algo no sea comprendido no convierte el jaspe en pizarra. Quizá por eso me atrae más la idea de Solve et Coagula: reconocer el abismo sin instalarme en él; disolver las ilusiones cuando sea necesario, pero también integrar aquello que permite vivir, aprender y construir.

I.CH.ronoS⏳

Maturity, development, inner transformation, one could say. Still, I am of the opinion that our perception as humans has been deliberately compromised by certain entities, and not everything we perceive 'out there' is actually valid. As if it were a matrix within a matrix

I.CH.ronoS⏳

Particularly in recent years, a vast number of offers regarding worldviews have emerged. The goal is to provide everyone with a fitting worldview, so that no one asks questions anymore or keeps searching. A sedative to remain passive. Something is waging a war against human existence. One could say poetically, as if we found ourselves in a war of 'light against darkness'. I made my choice long ago. Even if I were the last one against billions, I will never give my consent to something that just feels 'wrong

I.CH.ronoS⏳

Nobody can force you into anything. You have to make the choice yourself. You have to give your consent. No matter how heavy the pressure gets, no matter how sick the games are. Without your clear 'YES', nothing happens at all. But you also have to be ready to face the consequences. I’ve been homeless before, without a single cent to my name. I lived in the woods, and Mother Earth took care of me. For months. I have this subconscious 'respect' for water. I can't swim. When I was homeless, it was winter, and I fell off a bridge into the river. Haha, at that exact spot, the water only came up to my lips. Even though it was winter, I was burning up from the adrenaline. I’ve been hit by a car before, too, but luckily there was black ice on the road, so I just slid for a few meters like Superman flying. I’ve already survived three electric shocks, haha. Back in 2020, I sharpened machetes, bought a chainsaw, a taser, pyrotechnics, chemicals—I was determined that if it came down to it, I’d rather die fighting. But nobody does anything against my will. All I’m trying to say is this: without your explicit consent, nothing happens, and coincidences don't exist. It’s like there might be some kind of life plan that doesn't feel bad, and just because I don't understand it yet, doesn't automatically mean everything is set in stone. But despite this plan, you still have to make the big decisions yourself. What a paradox, haha

G

Well said, but wouldn't you agree that human perception has been deliberately compromised by 'certain entities' since the dawn of man? And that the emergence of the vast number of offers regarding worldviews is simply due to the digital age we live (evil) in? Yes, religious institutions have always provided the 'fitting worldview' so that no one asks questions or keeps searching. But today's new age spiritual communities – particularly the Westernized version of Eastern esoteric traditions – bombards humanity with different 'perceptions' to keep them in a perpetual state of searching. And as the saying goes: "To bankrupt a fool, give him information". Too much questioning and searching is also its own prison/inferno. Compromising human perception comes down to one thing – and that's to provide meaning to life. That's how certain entities are able to gain influence and power over humanity. I completely agree with your paradox at the end. But don't you believe humanity is also beholden to certain rules that have been set in this 'matrix within a matrix' that we live in? Such as : "one must only travel by day" -- I'm asking this because it's a rule that was broken by someone I loved deeply. And they faced the ultimate consequence for it.

G

I don't claim to know what the truth is. But what I'm attempting to convey, is that regardless of what one believes, or the autonomy they poses for their own lives and/or decisions, there is ultimately one truth, and we must all eventually come face to face with it. I'm of the opinion that the trick is not to view life as a pessimist, but as an optimist – and to leave the consequences to God. But that is also its own double edged sword.

I.CH.ronoS⏳

G : I don't know what you mean by 'only traveling during the day.' You're already the second person to mention that. The fact is, different entities do exist, and they even have a hierarchy and defined zones of influence. Some are immortal, others can be 'taken out.' But these entities don't have the divine spark. Only humans do—God's children in the highest divine order. Even Satan doesn't have this divine spark, though he is immortal. Actually, he’s personally behind digitalization and transhumanism. He thinks he can do a much better job than the Creator Himself. We need to realize that none of these entities possess this spark.

I.CH.ronoS⏳

G : I’m not traveling to other worlds, dimensions, or places just yet. Only once in a while, I’ll take a quick shortcut into the 'astral world' because I’ve stepped into the 'Position of Chronos' there. And I completely counter-attack all the stupid thoughts. I don't really do anything else there since I don't fully know this world, its rules, and hierarchies yet. But I take those stupid thoughts seriously because they're targeted at me, so I strike right back. Totally ruthless. Haha.. and people still don't believe mermaids exist 😘😉😈😇🧜‍♀️💎

I.CH.ronoS⏳

G : In my world, I decide what’s real and what’s not

G

Thanks for your thoughts. That's a very interesting take on things. Particularly what you mentioned as the divine spark we humans poses as children of the highest divine order. 'Travel only by day' is an adage used by people to navigate through this matrix until we cross to the other side of morning (or the other side of the veil). I asked for your thoughts on it because your comments on this post about worldviews and Cioran were interesting and well put.

G

Astral projection and remote viewing are very interesting abilities/subjects indeed. I'm of the opinion that those stupid thoughts are your subconscious distracting you from being fully present in the moment. So it's good that you counter-attack them. Only people who think this physical plane is all there is don't believe entities, God, or mermaids exist 😘😉♦️🌌😇🌊🧜🏻‍♀️

G

That's the best mindset to live (evil) life by as an optimist — and not as a pessimist as Cioran would suggest. All I'm saying is that we exist in a world bound by physical laws while we are in this mortal coil, which is why living life as an optimist can be a double edged sword if not done pragmatically in the physical plane