Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Blade Runner | FULL Reaction (Patreon)

Published:
2026-03-18 15:00:12
Imported:
2026-11

Videos

  • 630307438.mp4

Downloads

Content

Files

Comments

SEAN ƴü KAY

More like YES Runner...im lame, and excited...thx T...

SEAN ƴü KAY

You and whoever i need to thank should hear it..Thank-you, been picking good stuff to react to and making this whole channel better in many other ways too... killing it. Keep going. Thank-you

Uncle Phoenix

LOL. I really want to see this reaction. Tee is so good at this. But I know that, I have to catch up with fyp first.

nicholas ch

her face in the thumbnail is how i felt about this movie lol

Greg S.

The Final Cut is generally considered the definitive version of the film. It's also Ridley Scott's preferred version. Most people watching this for the first time go with the Final Cut. Honestly, I'd have gone with that and maybe revisit the movie to watch another version or two if you're really into it.

Kyle K

One of my all time favorites 😊

Johnny Bullis

Im confused.. the theatrical cut is 1 hour 52 min.. the final cut is 1 hr 57 min.. which one are you watching?

Jeff I.

Eh, I think the original theatrical cut that she watched is always best for a first time viewer. Harrison Ford's narration adds a lot of context to Deckard's character and the plot/themes of the movie that I've seen many reactors otherwise be left confused or wondering about on first watch. His little monologue while watching Roy die is one of the best parts of the movie for me. I know the big complaint is people like to say Ford's monotone narration style is bad, but it's really fitting with his jaded, world-weary character and the neo-noir style of the movie. It's basically how he talks to other people in the movie anyways.

LiteWeight Gaming / Reacting

I’ll definitely watch the Final Cut now that I’ve seen the theatrical! It just seemed (from the little I read) that the theatrical cut was better for first time viewers! Like I said in the intro, it’s hard to research without getting into spoiler territory, so I do the best I can with the information I have! 🤗

Jeff I.

Glad you enjoyed this one! It's one of my all-time favorites along with the sequel 2049. Without spoiling anything, I'll say that the sequel takes everything this movie does well, and takes it to whole 'nother level of amazing IMO. It builds on the story and its themes very well.

Alex Gorell

I’ve never been able to get into this movie I’ve tried. Several times.

Larry Darrell

I’ve never seen the theatrical cut all the way through. I saw the Final Cut first and loved it. Then I tried one day to watch the theatrical and was like “What the hell is this!?” and turned it off. Put the Final Cut in. Theatrical had a completely different feel to me.

Larry Darrell

Her face is how I felt about the Theatrical Cut.

Riggo 82

Yeah, so the theatrical cut is basically the same as the final cut. The main difference is some of the effects were touched up and the narration is gone. Incidentally, Harrison Ford did not want to add the narration track to the film. That was not part of the original script. It was do to the studio's influence. He decided that if he had to do it, he would do it terribly. And, you can tell. Also, I know that you didn't like the aggressiveness of the love scene between Deckard and Rachael. But, you have to remember that as a replicant, she could rip his arms off, if she wanted to. And, Deckard of course, knows this. So, in a way, he was the only one at risk in that scene.

Riggo 82

Yeah, if you remove the narration, it totally changes the feel of the film.

Larry Darrell

The narration did feel like an after thought, and IMO made the film feel more like a B Quality movie. Like a bad live action version of the Harry Canyon segment of Heavy Metal (1981).

Riggo 82

i believe this is just another instance of the studio underestimating their audience. They thought it would be too difficult for people to follow without an assist from the narrator.

James Hadden

First off, I just want to be clear, this is not a criticism of your choice of which version to watch, you made a best guess from the info you found, and ultimately it doesn’t really make much difference. This was my first time watching the theatrical version and now I know what people mean about the egregious narration. The vast majority is completely unnecessary as the questions it answers are answered shortly after just by watching. I didn’t find any of the differences changed the movie particularly, it’s just the Final Cut is a better version in my opinion, especially the ambiguous ending, which is much better than this one. I also think people recommending this one for a first watch are doing the audience a disservice, I just don’t think everything needs pointing out in such an obvious way, plus the narration, for me at least, pulled me out of the immersion of the world. Glad you enjoyed it.

Joe R

To me, the unicorn dream is a huge difference if you know what I'm talking about.

Joe R

Amazon is producing the Blade Runner 2099 miniseries starring Michelle Yeoh. It's supposed to be released this year.

Ari

Vangelis really made his mark with the synthy music and soundtracks of the '80s, most notably the theme song to Chariots of Fire.

Larry Darrell

Don’t ever forget, you can ask us if you’re unsure of which version should be watched and are afraid of doing your own research because of spoilers. And if there’s a disagreement over which version, that us patrons can’t resolve, then put up a poll. We’re here to help. :-)

Larry Darrell

You should definitely watch The Final Cut before watching the sequel. Either on or off channel.

Riggo 82

The unicorn dream is just a red herring. It's Ridley Scott's fantasy. The script writers, Hampton Fancher and David Peoples said emphatically, that Deckard was not a replicant. As did Harrison Ford. And, if you think about it, he can't be. Deckard, is no stronger than a normal man. And, why would the police hide the fact that he was a replicant, from him. Especially after replicants were outlawed. It doesn't make sense.

Jeff Turner

The book title leans into your outro so well...do robots dream of electric sheep?

Derek Little

First time I've watched the theatrical cut for a loooong time..eh, not as bad as I remember but will always prefer the 'final cut'. Would be really interested to see T's opinion on the differences between the two in a catch up at some point. Just a thought!

John A

oh I need to find my Theatrical Release now, I know I have it somewhere. hummm. been a long time since I see that version.

Narutoanime16

Such a good movie and I love the cyberpunk ness of it, this Ghost in the shell etc so many things do Cyberpunk style well

Ben Dixon

Dont think I've seen the theatrical version since the first time I saw the movie, you can hear in Harrison Ford's voice how little he wants to be doing the voice over, I think the final cut without the narration is better but I can also see why a studio exec would want the narration to add a little hand holding to help people understand what is going on.

Stefan Au

you lost me at "Amazon" xD (after rings of power) They can create their own original stuff I don't mind... if it fails, it fails, if it succeeds, even better... but I want them to keep their hands off established and beloved IPs...

Stefan Au

The screenwriters of this movie are not the source to quote here... the movie is based on a novel by Philip K. Dick... and left the question of whether or not Deckard is a replicant purposefully ambiguous... it's up to the reader how he interprets certain clues and hints that may or may not answer this very question - so does the movie btw: Gaff's final lines "too bad she won't live - but then again, who does" could be interpreted this way: she won't live cause someone is going to retire her... or because they simply don't consider a replicant's existence as "living" ... but then again, who does (you (meaning Deckard) also won't live for the same reason she won't... and as for his strengh... he could be a Nexus 7, designed to be even more indistinguishable from humans. I would also argue that none of the replicants actually wanted to kill him... Roy just wanted to scare the sh*t out of him. "Quite the experience to live in fear, isn't it?" The woman he tracked down with the scale from her costume wanted to buy some time so she could run. Even though she did hit him pretty hard and he recovered fairly quickly from it, and went on to shoot her. Pris... I don't know what the heck she was doing cause running away from him with her back towards him, only so she could do some flips as she approached him again, is not very much like I would expect a military model of the Nexus series would behave.. so maybe she just wanted to scare him as well - but again, he recovers pretty quickly from the leg choke hold and shoots her as well... Leon took a shot at him and he wasn't harmed very much by him either... come to think about it there is more hints that he is on the same level as the characters we know to be Nexus 6 replicants, than there are to suggest that he is not...

Dmitry Ishkov

It's funny. I was synching the copy I had, which is 'theatrical', but when you started talking about his noir-like monologue I was confused. My copy didn't have any. Turns out I was watching 'international theatrical' version.