Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

The Sydney-class Cruiser entered Systems Alliance service in the late 2130s as a direct expression of the Navy’s increasingly carrier-centered doctrine. Manufactured by Manswell Corporation, the Sydney was designed to occupy the space between conventional cruisers and true fleet carriers, combining cruiser-level combat power with a substantial embarked aerospace wing and expanded command facilities. 

At approximately 1,220 meters in length, 410 meters in width, and 275 meters in height, the Sydney was broader than the Warsaw-class and displaced roughly 15 million tons. Its widened hull housed large port and starboard aviation bays, repair facilities, ammunition stores, and command spaces that would have been impossible to accommodate within a conventional cruiser layout. 

Protection consisted of approximately 1.8 meters of Reinforced Titanium Alloy A3 Battleplate, supported by second-generation Electromagnetic Armor. Two Mark III Centauri D20 Generators provided electrical power, while a Mark III Chronos Engine supplied slipspace capability. 

Unlike the Warsaw-class, which emphasized direct ship-to-ship combat, the Sydney sacrificed one of the traditional twin spinal weapons for internal volume. Its primary armament consisted of a single 24M4R2 Magnetic Accelerator Cannon, supported by two Hercules Naval Coilguns, ten Hyperion Laser Cannons, approximately forty-eight Hurricane missile pods, two Havok Tactical Fusion Missile Silos, and forty-eight GUARDIAN Laser Point-Defense Guns. 

The resulting weapon suite remained formidable, but the Sydney’s defining capability was its embarked aerospace group. This allowed a Sydney to maintain combat air patrols, conduct long-range reconnaissance, launch anti-ship strikes, support planetary operations, and protect accompanying frigates without requiring a full carrier battlegroup. 

The class retained the Alliance cruiser tradition of versatility. Approximately five hundred Marines and could be refitted for planetary operation by replacing some of its aerospace ability. The Sydney could therefore support colonial reinforcement, evacuation, ground operations, anti-piracy patrols, and independent frontier deployments. 

Where the Warsaw represented the Alliance cruiser as a heavily armed generalist, the Sydney represented the same philosophy adapted to carrier doctrine. 

It remained a cruiser first. 

It simply brought its own air wing. 

Files

Comments

Quiet Time145

My, my! A "Light Carrier" housed in a cruisers body. I wonder what an actual Fleet Carrier looks like?! She has a lot of fighters and bombers, with transports and a decent armament. Jack-of-all-trades indeed!

GAMB42

Huh, I suppose there should be one or 2 of these in the incoming fleet? Which makes me ever more eager to see the Turians' reaction to proper human capital ships.

jonathan riley

It may may make more sense for the lunch bays to be at the bottom of the ship, due to windows and opening bays as a structural weakness. And bridge's would be in the part of the ship with the strongest armour and shields. In space, you got patrol duty and ship to ship combat, then you git to have the capacity to, transfer armies which means transport ships. It turns war into a massive version of the Pacific campaign during world War 2. The reason why the UNSC turned the old colonial shapes like the sprite of fire, into transports was, due to the lack of a dedicated support ship's. And by the end of the war that capacity was totally gone. The spirit had it's own factories and mining capabilities, which made it ideal for the Harvest campaign. The SA may lack that capability like the UNSC, just due to not needing it.

Xardas2995

Hyperion, I wrote a comment on spacebattles some time back on what kind of technological advancements might be interesting to be explored in the timeframe left till the Reapers. Just as a consideration. Having Manswell be focused on economies of scale for shipbuilding and more flexible designs is a nice touch instead of having it become the sole relevant company. Might be interesting to show some kind of insight into that from company perspective later. Like the FCW will definitely spark meetings on Alliance wanting more ships. I could see the specialized ships earning higher margins similar to luxury cars. However, I imagine Victor is intentionally pushing Manswell to stick to this approach due to his knowledge. Modifying the Warsaw into a carrier allows reusing parts as well.

Xardas2995

With the Warsaw already able to carry 20 strike craft I feel the Turians will be quite surprised by the amount of fighters they will face.

Xardas2995

Well, with humanity's different scale for ships in their eyes they will end up facing like 15 dreadnoughts or more. Then they will be surprises by the amount of fighters.

Xardas2995

I think the 55 ships of Hackett's carrier group will be roughly the following: One "proper" carrier as flagship we have not seen the model of, yet. Two Audacious battle cruiers. Four Sydney class cruisers. Six Warsaw class cruisers. One to two Midway class electronic warfare frigattes. 10 Inchon frigattes. The rest will be Agincour class. Though the cruiser part could also be bigger in total. Aside from that maybe some more ships/QRFs from Arcturus are sent with Hackett. Hyperion, if you don't have the way the naval battle is supposed to play out completely down, yet. So the Alliance reinforcements will arrive via relay. Hackett already asked the AI which attack vector will make it most difficult for the Turians to cover Shanxi's orbit, fight back against the human ships and cover the relay to relay 314. How about after the Alliance ships arrive they wait a little for the Turians to approach then some Alliance ships do slipspace jumps closer to Shanxi. The Turians would need to send ships there or they will allow ground reinforcements to get to Shanxi which would probably be rather bad considering Vanguard is still holding binding the Turian effort.

Hyperion2708

The draft is finish and waiting for editing actually. It not much of a spoiler but the tactic would be layers not simple as unleash fighters and let them do the work because, as you might notice, carrier doctrine in space is very different compare to wet navies 😉. As for fleet composition, well, the next chapter, I'll introduce one more ship class.