Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Downloads

Content

For those of you who like your Gurometer optimised in audio format here you go!

Let's see precisely how many gurograms there are in these two hunky scientists.

Comments

Cesare

Thanks for that. Much easier to listen than to watch.

Robert Andrews

Aficionados of a guru and academia decoding, I wonder if you had seen this "crackpot index"? Pretty sure a couple of Guru-like Brothers would score highly on this.

Robert Andrews

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html "10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked on your own.) 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize. 20 points for talking about how great your theory is, but never actually explaining it. 20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) ridicule accorded to your past theories. 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike. 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on. 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions."

Dee Loves Ketchup on Eggs

Have yet to listen but this is one behemoth I can’t wait to tackle! Btw - have you at DTG listened to Julian Walker’s (from Conspirituality) reporting on Brett and Heather? When you hear the phrase Mr Weinstein uses, “The Coalition Slicer Dicer”, you have to use this sound bite when you shout out DTG patrons!