Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

The question came up of “What would local Koreans feel/do if they knew Young-Mi’s origins?”

The very short and oversimplified answer: As far as I can tell, they wouldn’t care. 

Now, we are dealing with how real people would react to the use of a fictional technology in a country I have never visited. So I am learning a lot from friends who have been there and the internet. But this is what I’ve found that leads me in this direction. So give me a few grains of salt as I could be wrong about things. 

This is not my opinion on how I think people should react, but my armchair, unprofessional sociologist view on how I think they could react.

Plastic Surgery is not demonized in South Korea

Ok, this is a weird place to start, but I’m using it as a baseline of what people might feel about the use of nanobot technology for altering physical appearance in general. From what I can see it seems to be fairly accepted as opposed to the stigmatized feeling in the US. 

I’m painting with a pretty big brush. America (maybe the West in general) does not have a healthy relationship with body modification. There are too many shows welcoming people to point and gawk at plastic surgery gone wrong, or people speculating what celeb got botox and how shallow they must be. 

So with a healthier outlook on people wanting to modify their bodies, I assume more acceptance of the trade market as a whole. I’m sure it still ruins people's lives and a plenty of people hate it As a whole, I’ll say in this fiction, it’s probably looked upon favorably. 

A Willingness to Share Culture

That’s kind of the best way I can say it. 

Stephanie/Young-Mi mentions that you can rent traditional garments to wear at the temple. From what I can see, no one cares if white people do this. I can see in the US it’s viewed with a bit more problematic lens. But it is more along the lines of someone coming from another country and dressing up in colonial era wear to visit Colonial Williamsburg. Is it a bit tacky? Sure. But no one is policing to make sure that only ‘authentic’ people are doing it (at least no one should be). 

Similarly with the sharing of stories, there seems to be an openness to other countries adapting and altering stories for their local people. I’ll extend this to other Eastern countries for more known examples. Biggest one I can think of is that Japan doesn’t give a shit that Scarlet Johansson was in Ghost in the Machine. Most stories coming out of Japan are about Japanese people. It is an expectation that when selling a story overseas that it will change. The meaning will change. 

But even in the US we sell our stories to be in other countries all the time. American characters are changed all the time. There is a version of Breaking Bad set in Columbia with a fully Latino/Hispanic cast. 

Because of the size and make up of the US, things are much more delicate. 

The makeup of South Korea is 95-99% Korean. That percentage is excluding people of Chinese, or Filipino, etc descent. There isn’t really a motivation to accommodate other cultures. 

Meanwhile in the US, a basic breakdown is 58% White/European; 12% Black/African American; 19% Hispanic/Latino; 6% Asian; 5% Multi-racial; <1% Other.

The US gets even more splintered when we let people self-report their ancestry with 14% Black/African American; 12% German; 11% Mexican; 9% English; 9% Irish; 5% “American”; 4.8% Italian; 2.5% Polish, so on and so on. 

We have so many different identities, and instinctively people are more defensive of how they are portrayed and they want to fight for representation. This isn’t just Japanese Americans angry at Scarlett Johansson. This is also the Italian Anti-Defamation League suing the Sopranos. Anyone angry about how the Irish are portrayed in Star Trek. 

The cultural identity is so strong in South Korea that someone like Stephanie isn’t really causing any ripples. 

But if I’ve been ignoring something, it is that people would be much more angry at Stephanie and Lexi in the US. 

Files

Comments

Rag345

That illustration, is that white Steph and Young-Mi?

roseleaf

Correct. I figured I'd change some stuff up with a unique image for the "commentary"

Rag345

I see and it's nice to see how Steph would look if she didn't go through that trade. But on the question of how people would take it in SK and the US, what about other nations. Like you mention it wouldn't be a problem as much as it would be in the US but given the disapora wouldn't those opinions be mixed? Not to mention even with the fact you mention that you don't quite show people being angry about in the US, is it possible we might start to see that in future pages? And you mention that the makeup of SK, but is there the possibility that Young-mi might have different treatment if say her trader was mixed like Black and Korean or even Latina and Korean rather then monoracially Korean? Like how far does that acceptance go given Young-mi presents as a monoracial woman in both her White and Korean bodies. And on that note, I know the question of identity death was something I think the comic has tried to avoid, but what about people willing to go through that kind of trade to reach that? I'd have to imagine even if other societies might accept ethnicity and cultural trades, the question of identity death might be even more complicated to agree on a consensus. Or even people that try to "fake" their race for "supposed" gains like outrage-baiters or even a Rachel Dolezal like that has to elicit some reaction to it.

roseleaf

Would we see more people angry, react, etc on race in the future of this comic? I don't know. I wouldn't hold my breath. I wanted to go further into those things, but I feel the story got too big for me to be able to narrow in more on those topics in the way that I would want. Maybe if a future comic focuses more on a ethnicity change we could see more. Would Steph get get different treatment if she was bi-racial? Yes, but it would due to her identity, not due to the trade tech. Identity Death It's difficult to put a pin on it. But overall I'll say not probable with this tech. It's a big essay about what makes a person who they are. Rage Bait Steph and Lexi sidestepped this a bit by not initiating the trade. The other person wanted to do it.

Rag345

This comic has been really long so I would say there's some time albeit maybe limited I suppose. Hopefully there could be a side story. But given Open Trade and Final Exam plus the Ballad of Harper Kelly take place in the same universe, it's definitely a topic that could be revisited or nuanced in any future comics in this world. And I hope Open Trade isn't the last comic to be set in the world that was created with this tech I think that conversation in Issue 5 did give some insight plus the cafe conversation with Victory and Lexi's friends try to touch on this. I feel like there's a lot of questions that what can the tech do if it can't do identity death, what would the line between identity and identity death would be? I think with the other people initiating the trade in the first place, it does raise questions on the subject of race and its perceptions with this tech and how it could be exploitative, informative, or destabilizing in that aspect.