Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Jorge Luis Borges' 'The Library of Babel' is one of my all-time-favourite short stories.

Borges is dense, difficult, speculative poeticism.

He is one of the most important Argentine writers and his ficciones offer a cerebral pleasure quite different from those gifted to us by Chekhov and Turgenev.

His stories are more akin to chess games, crossword puzzles, or math problems than immersive imaginative worlds.

This particular story explores the infinite monkey theorem, but with a library and books instead of primates and typewriters.

This story also contains the meaning of life, and is well worth your time to quietly and carefully reread.

I am working from the Everyman's Library edition of Borges' Ficciones in which 'The Library of Babel' is housed along with many more triumphs of short fiction.

Masterclass Timestamps:

  • 0:00 Borges is dense speculative poeticism
  • 1:00 the Latin American literary tradition
  • 2:00 Borges vs Chekhov
  • 2:30 infinite monkeys and typewriters theorem
  • 4:00 mirrors and labyrinths
  • 4:30 “The universe, which others call the Library”
  • 9:00 Paradise Lost parallels
  • 10:00 “that for which we find words for is already dead in our hearts” (Nietzsche)
  • 10:30 “If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite.” (Blake)
  • 11:30 an Emily Dickinson breadcrumb for you to follow
  • 14:30 “that cyclical book is God” - God is at the circumference
  • 15:30 what is God? Where is God? “Comparing the distance between the divine and human”
  • 16:00 “man’s reach should exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” (Browning)
  • 16:10 the nature of “ab aeterno” - from, but not until, eternity
  • 16:30 refuting the Nietzschean idea of eternal recurrence (near eternal recurrence)
  • 17:00 is eternity, and time, behind us? All around us?
  • 19:00 O Time your pyramids
  • 19:50 is meaning accidental?
  • 20:05 is thought infinite? Is our ability to express ourselves finite?
  • 21:00 if you hunt for God within the finite, you will not find him
  • 23:00 digital equivalent of the Library of Babel
  • 24:00 the minute history of the future, biographies of archangels (my favourite passage in all of literature)
  • 24:40 the nature of infinity
  • 25:17 monitor the excitement you feel at these words
  • 25:55 the possibility of finding your own Vindication is so unlikely it might as well be impossible
  • 26:20 the Library of Babel is not infinite
  • 27:00 the meaning of life
  • 28:30 “the limitless dimensions of hope”
  • 29:40 we’re reading a metaphor for human history up until this point
  • 30:20 uncommon hope followed by deep depression
  • 31:00 the problem with censorship
  • 32:00 evocations of the religious Crusades
  • 33:23 do you understand quantum mechanics?
  • 34:00 do you see the same heaven as me? Do you feel the same hell?
  • 35:30 why Borges’ short ficciones are so short
  • 36:30 “you who read me - are you sure you understand my language?”
  • 38:00 the “unique human species” - artificial intelligence and human consciousness
  • 38:30 humans will extinct themselves
  • 39:58 “the Library is limitless and periodic” (repeated disorder is order itself)
  • 40:45 what do you make of this story?

I would be extremely keen to hear your thoughts on this story.

How was Borges for you?

Happy reading!

Files

Previews only

Jorge Luis Borges' 'The Library of Babel' - Short Story Appreciation Masterclass

0:00 Borges is dense speculative poeticism 1:00 the Latin American literary tradition 2:00 Borges vs Chekhov 2:30 infinite monkeys and typewriters theorem 4:00 mirrors and labyrinths 4:30 “The universe, which others call the Library” 9:00 Paradise Lost parallels 10:00 “that for which we find words for is already dead in our hearts” (Nietzsche) 10:30 “If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite.” (Blake) 11:30 an Emily Dickinson breadcrumb for you to follow 14:30 “that cyclical book is God” - God is at the circumference 15:30 what is God? Where is God? “Comparing the distance between the divine and human” 16:00 “man’s reach should exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” (Browning) 16:10 the nature of “ab aeterno” - from, but not until, eternity 16:30 refuting the Nietzschean idea of eternal recurrence (near eternal recurrence) 17:00 is eternity, and time, behind us? All around us? 19:00 O Time your pyramids 19:50 is meaning accidental? 20:05 is thought infinite? Is our ability to express ourselves finite? 21:00 if you hunt for God within the finite, you will not find him 23:00 digital equivalent of the Library of Babel 24:00 the minute history of the future, biographies of archangels (my favourite passage in all of literature) 24:40 the nature of infinity 25:17 monitor the excitement you feel at these words 25:55 the possibility of finding your own Vindication is so unlikely it might as well be impossible 26:20 the Library of Babel is not infinite 27:00 the meaning of life 28:30 “the limitless dimensions of hope” 29:40 we’re reading a metaphor for human history up until this point 30:20 uncommon hope followed by deep depression 31:00 the problem with censorship 32:00 evocations of the religious Crusades 33:23 do you understand quantum mechanics? 34:00 do you see the same heaven as me? Do you feel the same hell? 35:30 why Borges’ short ficciones are so short 36:30 “you who read me - are you sure you understand my language?” 38:00 the “unique human species” - artificial intelligence and human consciousness 38:30 humans will extinct themselves 39:58 “the Library is limitless and periodic” (repeated disorder is order itself) 40:45 what do you make of this story?

Comments

Anonymous

Wow, what a story. I agree with you, Ben, Borges is difficult and this story is difficult, but I think it’s difficult because of the near-infinite interpretations of what the author/Borges is trying to say (“are you certain you understand my language?”). It makes me think of ideas such as the multiverse, where in theory if every decision split off its own timeline or universe, that number of universes would be “unimaginably vast”, but "is not infinite.” The ending is really an enigma to me. Is he saying that the lack of a defined meaning IS the meaning? And that we should take comfort in our lack of understanding, because people have never understood, and WILL NEVER understand, so we’re not alone and it’s ok. I guess in its way, that could be comforting. I’ve personally struggled in my life with not knowing the answers to the BIG questions, until one day I heard someone say, “It’s understandable to struggle, we haven’t evolved to be able to answer those questions. Just let it go.” That helped.

Anonymous

I just finished reading this story since I am now reading the Collected Fictions of Jorge Luis Borges. I does really make you ponder on the nature of infinity, which to me is still something incomprehensible. In this story the library, since there is a limit in the amount of words, pages and dimensions of every book, there are a finite amount of possibilities within the library. However, all the knowledge, all the answers to all the questions that are or will be, are included in those pages. Same as that all the falsehoods or simple nonsense are included. When I look at it that way, it seems that the library does not seem anything more than life itself. Answers to questions are out there, you might find them, or you may not. For every answer or piece of knowledge, there are so many more pieces of nonsense. But I guess that also attributes to the comparison of the library to the universe. When reading "Ficciones" I do also like the comparison with the other story "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote", in which an author wants to replicate Don Quixote word for word, without having read it. This also shows a finite, but seemingly infinite amount of possibilities. I just like the fact that Borges makes you think and in a way philosophize in his short stories, without giving any answers. He keeps an air of mystery in his short stories and this makes him one of my favorite authors of all time.