Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Hello again! Here's what's going on with the development of SEUS PTGI E11!A lot of research has gone into this update, and there are still some things being worked out that will hopefully arrive in E12. The adaptive temporal GI filter (for instant lighting changes) is still being worked on, for example, and won't make it into E11.

I've put a lot of time into working on optimization. Most ideas don't work out, but some do. I've managed to optimize the GI filter a bit without redesigning it, so it should mostly look the same. The reflection filter has a new optimization feature that basically tries to skip doing denoising if reflections aren't very visible in a region of pixels. It works fairly well, and it does cause additional noise in areas where reflections are subtle/not very bright, but I'll include an option to disable this optimization.

The worst performance situations occur when using high resolution resource packs with normal and specular maps and Full Raytrace Reflections is On. I've tried to save some frames in this situation by simplifying the shading of blocks that rays hit. This makes almost no difference visually in most cases, but gives a bit performance boost. The only problem left with it is that this simplification is really noticeable with reflected blocks that are close to the reflective surface. I need to add logic to fix this to be able to say just how much performance improvement there will be, but things are looking good!

Quite a bit of research has gone into improving mod support in the future as well. I'll probably be putting together a tool that will help users setup SEUS PTGI to be compatible with the mods they've got installed. This will require a rework of SEUS PTGI's block ID handling and voxelization to make sure things don't break too much with unexpected block shapes. Know that this is something I'll be working on, even if I don't mention it in the next dev news post.

Lastly, I've put a lot of work into one of the visually weakest areas of PTGI, the sky and clouds. The sky is a really simple (and really fake) model I put together to be as lightweight as possible. But recently, I've found a new approach that relies more heavily on the math (so a lot of work goes into creating the right formulas), but after the math is worked out, the shader code is as simple as evaluating the final formula, without any iteration loops. The result is a hopefully more realistic sky overall, but it still needs a little bit of work. Expect somewhat abrupt dawn/dusk transitions while that is being worked out.

And well, the clouds in SEUS PTGI are ancient and bad. When approaching writing the new clouds, I knew that I wanted them to be cheap enough to have them render in raytraced reflections and GI. So, volumetric clouds were out of the question. I decided to see how far I could push a 2D clouds system to look 3D.

Also, I experimented with making the structure of the clouds more blocky, to bring some Minecraft essence to them.

Which look do you prefer? I'll have an option for both, but I've always enjoyed the juxtaposition of a blocky world rendered in a realistic manner, and the blocky clouds give that sort of vibe.

Once again, I'll provide an option to disable them altogether if you'd rather save the frames, but the performance impact is looking pretty low so far, since they're just 2D clouds (no raymarching). 

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Files

Comments

Ian McCabe

I assume the 2D clouds are like MC's 2D Cloud Option? At least at the code level? Also, they do kinda looks like clouds to me, although I do think the connections could be a bit less blocky, the 2nd to the last image is a major showcase of that. As for other topics, will E11 have some implementation of Mod-support based on the previous question you asked?

FernyL

Loving the blocky clouds! Keep up the good work.

dana44

Any updates about how the shaders run on your Radeon 580 or a newer generation 5700?

SnowTheBard

I definitely think the blocky clouds really fit in better and look fantastic - great work!

Ultimate Immersion

Great work once again Cody, any chance to have both cloud options in shader settings? Natural and “lore-friendly”?

NMLWright

I think the boxier cloud option would work best because it better befits the Minecraft aesthetic while maintaining the desired juxtaposition.

DC

I really love the boxy clouds!

Ghent Games

Agreed, I love how they stay in theme with minecraft but are very subtle. Definitely go with that :D

shimmer.shine

+1 for boxy clouds! they fit really well with this juxtaposition of realism and the reminder that you are, in fact, in minecraft

Patrick Schmitt

Your cloud-ideas are really interesting. Looking forward to it Cody! Thanks for your work so far!

Realism Mats

This is very interesting and beautiful results and also loving that you are working on high resolution resource packs performance since I'm working on one and I would love if it can get a little more fps, amazing job!

Anonlou

Looking forward to it. That's the major thing that's been missing from my experience. Although I really miss the clouds that block the ground when you get high enough. It made my map with airships really believable

Chase Sutton

Those blocky clouds are sick. Besides, if the world/terrain is made to be blocky, what's the harm in a blocky sky? Also, if it means better performance, then definitely put these awesome clouds in.

Lalo

But the clouds would have shadows? I would make it much more realistic, I also still think that a depth of field effect is absolutely necessary to appreciate landscapes, or constructions with texture pcks, will it be added in the future? only if possible of course

SlayerDan216 (edited)

Comment edits

2026-09-05 21:00 I love the realistic clouds myself. They just make it so pretty. Side note, endrods need to emit light. I can't see a thing in my friends house :-P
2019-11-08 21:58

Ian McCabe

Oh yeah, that is an issue, Cody, can we get that fixed?

Corosar

I find the Boxy clouds amazingly humourous. It works perfectly for how minecraft works out. If its not too much having the choice available for people to choose might be a good idea.. but i worry that means maintaining more things. That could be a problem. I vote for blocky clouds. Also that tool being worked on to help bring modded Block ID's in is gonna be a life saver. I have already delved into the block id file a couple times to get modded torches working right. It would definitely make life easier for those unaware of how to do it. and don't want to risk breaking the shaders multiple times as they try to get light to emit from something.

CielMC

Dude, theres another problem with the doors that their shade is just a single line instead of the entire tile entity

Bobell

I like the block clouds

Phoenix Nemo

Has light source on end rod fixed yet?

akem 8

New clouds look too angular and too many clouds float in the sky. and I think seus ptgi needs more farther shader distance. I was disappointed with this dev news. But I believe it will show you better results as you have done so far.

Deputy Jed08

also a burning mob doesn't emit light....

Deputy Jed08

block clouds are better but it's better also to make it an option

Deputy Jed08

i think seus shaders doesn't have DOF...

Lalo

Zeus v10.2

Orizon_

Beautiful Clouds! Great Job!!

Jordan Bennett

Both clouds look awesome but more importantly are end rods getting fixed? They don't illuminate up close.

Johann Korn

I was wondering about the sky already (I've only been testing the pack for a few weeks now) and the new clouds are crazy, I really like them.

J. -Dr.Pyanco

I have an AMD processor; I guess even this shader keeps the incompatibility. So I'll have to find another shader... 😐

Cypressed

Okay I am LOVING the Minecrafty blocky clouds SO MUCH, I literally blurted out "awwww YEAH" at work XD thank goodness I'm alone overnight! Could there be some kind of hybrid mode where the clouds ARE occupying 3d space that you can fly through but their REFLECTIONS are 2d...? Or would that just be crazy trouble?

Vapor619

hey i have a question about this new update and v10 do the iron blocks still do the reflections like mirrors or is that a removed feature? if you can respond that'll be great.

炜铖 叶

为什么没有别的支付方式

Sam Sam

So I paid 1$ for nothing? great bro....

StanchestCord3

For clouds you could add a setting where we could change how the clouds look, the thickness to them, how blocky they look, maybe color

schneehaskiy

Can anyone help me Have a Nvidia gtx 1070, but I have extreme lags with the shader although I've seen test where people have significantly more FPS.

Evan The Sloth

I have an RTX 2060 SUPER and can only run it at 100-120 so lag is a given unless you have a pretty beefy computer

Hunger_Legend

Bonjour, quelle abonnement faut prendre pour avoir accès au discord et au shader seus ptgi ?

MikjoA

le gold, et le téléchargement des shaders se trouve en bas des posts

Aurélien Faugere

what is the minimal configuration of SEUS PTGI E11? ANd the recommended configuration? The configuration GTX 1650, 16 Go of RAM, Core I5 9300H is enough?

Heiden Shadows

I get about 50-60fps with a Vega 56, and the Vega 56 is about 50% faster than a 1650, so you might see yourself in the 30-40 fps range. Cutting down render distance is one of the best ways to improve performance. I play at 16 chunks.

Heiden Shadows

This is dependent on your resource pack.

Heiden Shadows

Run at 1920x1080 maximum, 16 chunk render distance, and some of the refined settings in the shader settings will heavily impact performance, such as having reflections for dropped and minor world objects. Your texture pack resolution also will provide a performance hit. I have a 128x resource pack with bumpmapping, and it tanks my Vega 56 to 50-60fps average.

Heiden Shadows

Incompatibility? I run with a 2700X and it looks and runs fine...

Vapor619

What resource pack works for that

Ian McAlindon

That's why you read what you're getting before buying something online, you have nobody to blame but yourself. It clearly says that only the $10/mo tier gets you access to experimental shaders

Ian McAlindon

What kind of AMD processor? I have ran this shader with 0 incompatibility issues on both FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3600

Jorge López

You can change tier before the end of the month, and it only passes you the 10$ bill

Jorge López

He may add it in the future, but he is focused on the GI. Also, Optifine is already pushed to the max with this shader, adding DoF would be a performance destroyer.

Niffle

What about the snow . .

Fischer

can we get an option for og clouds/sky? I think i'd be cool to have raytraced cloud shadows with the original sky/clouds

Fischer

Oh, also, can we expect to ever be able to see the playermodel in reflections? (ok just one more: what about fully reflective iron blocks? like mirrors)

Cody Putnam

how are you getting 100-120 on a 2060 super, i got a 2070 and im only getting 35-40

Jonas Pribyl

Block reflectivity is up to resourcepack creators to add, I think. You can just change the specular texture of a block, if you want.

Jonas Pribyl

When can we expect fog to be implemented? I really like the looks of this pack, but can't justify the price, because the edges where rendering stops are just plain ugly to me. Also, everything just looks so much better with quality fog!

Kylo Ren

What version of Minecraft do I need to run for pgti e11 to work? And what version of optifine

Bob

How do I make it not so blurry under water

Matthew Doyle

Nice work so far, but I must say it is super bright in caves. Anything I can do in the settings to reduce that?

joona

i just wasted 10 euros for thisi cant run this with gtx 1060 3gb and inter i5-8400 does anyone have any advice how i can make it run other than i already tried lower resolution but it had no signicant performance difference PLEASE HELP.

Stephen M. Robinson

This is my first pc build, and just wanted to know will I be ok running these shaders with a 2080, a 3800x, and 32gb of ram?

Lazyflame2

Yep, you'll be A-okay. Im running an RTX2070 super, an old Intel i7-6700k and 64gb of ram. The hardware you mentioned will be plenty fast to run this, just keep in mind that the shader is still in development so you might need to play with settings a bit to get a stable frame rate that your happy with. but from the devlogs Sonic said he is trying to work on optimization so I would expect frame rates to get a little better in the future. Good luck with your first build! its super exciting the first time you get a new system to post!

Stephen M. Robinson

I’ve been using it since last night and I don’t want to play Minecraft any other way lol. I was tweaking with a lot of the setting and I’ve been able to get good settings with steady 55-60 FPS

Stephen M. Robinson

It’s been a blast I’m as soon as I was done I wanted to build another one haha but thanks for the advice!!

Bray

it keeps saying ive supported 10$ yet i dont have access to anything

Alabi

Follow me to check some of my pictures

Hunger_Legend

YES!!! PTGI fonctionne avec les CG AMD ( j'ai une rx 580oc) je fait du 15-30fps avec le jeux quasi au max

1xenon1 .

ti ho dato 1€ e tu NON MI DAI LA SHADER

Sa1mon

HOW TO WITHDRAW FROM SUPPORTING LESS TO PAY EVERY MONTH 1usd

Max Daisley

PE Shaders will never exist, sorry kid.

mckite

Some Graphics are have glitches