Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

MARA still has lowest NAV Premium

Semler and MSTR do not mind buying BTC at $107K

Files

Previews only

Comments

Alex=Mogix

Have you thought of adding ALTBG to this and SWC? I know small compared to some but being some of the first euro treasuries would be nice to see 👍🏻💪🏻

iroc007

Mara nice

Steve

Hi James, could you not add SWC to the list as they hold 1000 BTC which is more than many on here. Their posts on X also tend to be reposted by Mr Saylor

MrPresident

Sorry James, $GNS is outdated in terms of price and btc holding.

Pla Dim

Thank you James and IA team 👍🍀🤘👏

TFB5

GNS only holds 120 BTC.... please correct

WinstonChurchill

sold semler today on the pump at a 10% profit. They kinda suck... at least with MSTR or TSLA I can sell CCs on big pumps

WinstonChurchill

Yeah man. I'm hoping they can hit $30 by mid September on a good BTC pump and a better nav prem valuation. My $20 calls would print

DocScottExplorer

Can anyone in layman’s simple terms not assuming someone understands anything about NAV premiums. And not using synonyms!! Explain NAV premiums? And mainly the ratio deal. Is higher number better or lower? Ex: MSTR /TSLA and someone (James) says NAV premium 1.25. What does that mean!? Is the 1.25 in relation to MSTR or TSLA? And what does it mean? 🙏🙏🙏

ActionMan

Outdated info... MetaPlanet now holding 15,555

SGT X

If MARA has a NAV Premium of 1.14, it means the stock is trading at a price 14% higher than the value of the Bitcoin it owns per share. Here's a quick example... Suppose MARA’s Bitcoin holdings per share (its NAV per share) are $15.00. With a NAV Premium of 1.14, the stock price would be $15.00 x 1.14 or $17.10. If MARA shares are trading around $17.10, while the Bitcoin it owns per share is worth $15.00, investors are paying a 14% premium over the company’s Bitcoin value. Is higher or lower better? Lower premium (closer to 1.00) means the stock price is closer to the actual value of the Bitcoin it owns. This is often considered safer if you just want exposure to Bitcoin. Higher premium (well above 1.00) means investors are paying extra, possibly because they expect MARA’s business (like mining operations or future growth) to add value beyond just holding Bitcoin. In summary, with a NAV Premium of 1.14, you pay 14% more than the value of MARA’s Bitcoin per share. Investors might pay this premium if they believe MARA can grow, mine more Bitcoin efficiently, or use its business model to outperform simply holding Bitcoin itself. Hope this helps.

Chris P

James. Is there a chart with previous nav premium highs?