Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Videos

  • 736138534.mp4

Downloads

Content

WHO IS THIS MAN??!! WE NEED MORE STAND UP COMEDY!!!

Here is the FULL and UNBLURRED reaction to Jeff Jefferies for the First time!

Enjoy!!

Files

Comments

CptStupendous

It's actually "JIM" Jeffries, and he is amazingly talented.

Ardane

Paraphrased from Wikipedia: In 1996 Martin Bryant murdered 35 people and wounded 23 others in the deadliest deadliest mass shooting by a lone gunman in modern Australian history.

seansky

i think most comedy on british i seen were more centred around the colonising history lol

DrA

As an American I should have the right to play a point and click adventure whenever I want. XD

DrA

Someone in my town got deported for owning a gun illegally. He was school faculty that came in on a student visa as a kid, and never became an actual citizen in the decade he was there illegally...

DrA

I'm mixed race, my father was from the country that 60% of people there say it's like hell. I'm culturally American due to the values I have. There are many cultures in America, but as long as you feel you hold an amount of American culture in your beliefs is the only real factor as vague as it is. Also saying America is a country of immigrants would have been idiotic simply for the fact that it was specifically the hard working, and the people who knew they would have to build their life up from nothing that were the main source of immigrants. I personally consider that line a bastardization of history. For example people forget that black American culture created: Ragtime, Stride piano, Jazz, Swing and big band, Bebop, Hard bop, R&B and jump blues, Rock and roll, Soul, Funk, Hip-hop, House and techno. I would hardly call black Americans immigrants given the amount of soul they brought America throughout it's short history.

DrA

Dumb Americans call themself Irish very often because it's short for 'The group the Irish colonized' without realizing they have no Irish relations outside of that. XD

DrA

Literally 1.4% of Americans owned slaves during the civil war. The argument wasn't they wanted to keep their slaves, it was people not wanting to reform the systems in place already. The whole reason it was abolished in the west was because employers found out it was cheaper to not provide food, and housing to their workers, and easier to work to death and replace people a lot more often outside of slaves which had to be treated better for consistent good results. Honestly some of my policies I want enforced are basically a direct response to the power shifting from slave owners who want to keep their people healthy to healthcare companies that just want people to feed them endless money for minimal results.

Shinigamiinochi

I'm really out of touch with modern comedians, but these were some of my favorites when I was a kid and teenager: Lewis Black, Eddie Izzard, Brian Regan, Mitch Hedberg, Christopher Titus, and you can check out songs from Bo Burham's Inside.

Juho Kaartoaho

Luke needs to react to The Machine. Bert Kreischer.

Robert Dirk H.

Luke, it would be really cool if you could react to just the first episode of each of the following anime, so you can choose which anime you would prefer to watch: - Tokyo Ghoul - The Promised Neverland - Mirrai Nikki - Elfen Lied - Dororo - Deadman Wonderland - Terror in Resonance - Rainbow Nisha First episode reactions always get a lot of clicks and you also can see which anime would get the most interest in viewership.

System_Glitch

I'm just popping on by to pitch Taylor Tomlinson. Her videos are long, but I personally love her most recent one. That's all, enjoy your day :)

Mary Hatch

I think you would love Bo burnham. Comedy with music. I would recommend “make happy” on Netflix and then inside.

Kyle Garrett

Personally I think the correct approach is to heavily regulate bullets, not the guns. You want to collect guns? Go for it. You want a gun for defense? By all means. However the number of bullets you can have total, is monitored by the government, and if you want more bullets, you have to provide proof the original bullets you received have been fired. That could be proof from a shooting range, a police report, or having the physical casings. Controlling the bullets controls the scope of damage that can be caused, while still letting people own the guns they want to own. I also think that it's WAY harder to make bullets at home than it is to like, 3d print a gun / gun components. So it's overall a lot safer for everyone. You'd still get pushback against letting the government regulate your bullets, since the die hard Americans want guns to use against the government if they become tyrannical, but it's more likely to go through than outright banning guns.

Alex McLeod

would love to see some Michael McIntyre. maybe booking tickets online or Feeding, Dressing, Washing And Putting Kids To Bed Is A Never Ending Battle!

Riv

1.4% is so misleading its basically a lie, during the civil war slavery was already banned in most of the union states. In slave states around 1/4 of white families owned slaves, and if i had to guess i dont think the rest strongly opposed slavery, i would probably say that they couldn't afford it, and the reason most of them supported slavery was because they relied on it or were hoping they would eventually be able to. Why suddenly so vague? "the systems in place" meaning the slave economy, the people who rented slaves, people who insured slaves, people involved in the slave trade, and businesses that relied on slave produced products. see NPS page 3 of The United States on the Eve of the Civil War

DrA

Fair, 1.4% is the whole country's population. Among Southern white families it was more like one in four, and over half in Mississippi. That number undersells it. I'll take that. You said I was being vague about "the systems in place." Fair. I meant the banks that financed them. The insurers who underwrote them. The traders who moved them. The politicians who represented them. The war was that system defending itself, not a few guys protecting property. Now your guess. You said you'd guess the rest didn't strongly oppose slavery because they couldn't afford slaves and hoped to own them someday. Maybe. Some probably did hope for that. But here's what I won't do. I won't make that same guess about most Americans today and the healthcare system that bleeds them dry. Most of them don't own the system. They don't profit from it. They just live inside it. They complain about it. They vote against it. They still don't tear it down. That doesn't mean they approve of it. It means opposing something and being able to end it are different things. So if that's your standard for them, it's not much of a standard. And if it's not a good guess about people alive today who can organize, vote, and protest, I don't know why it's a good guess about people who lived under a system that would kill them for organizing, voting, or protesting.

Zer0

In the UK, they took all the guns because bad guys used guns. UK now has knife crime, so they are taking away all the knives.

Tokken Release

Uh you should definitely also checkout Jim Jeffries "Freedumb" special at one point.

Kenneth Hoerz

I'm an American. I love how he put it all because... again he makes good points. I have relative that have guns, and friends of the family. I don't. When it comes to people that REALLY demand to have guns, go south or find a Republican.

Kenneth Hoerz

Perfect you want 4 Great comedians, Jeff Foxworthy, Larry the Cable Guy, Jim Gaffigan, and Fortune Feimster!

Philiboy49

Approximately 25% to 32% of all households (or families) in the American South owned enslaved people in 1860.Key Details from the 1860 Census Southern Household Average: Roughly 1 in 4 (25%) to nearly 1 in 3 (32%) white or free families in slave states owned slaves.