Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

The February sneak-peek is less about content and more about behind-the-scenes. I seem to be taking a big turn on current work & thought I’d explain a bit.

So the thing about writing a novel is how it takes a long time and it’s mostly done in solitude. Readers generally don’t see all the stuff you scrap, things you go back and revise, and story beats you didn’t plan at all until you suddenly realize they’re necessary—and then go all the way back to the beginning to set up in the first place. Y’know, like you planned it all along, ‘cause you’re a genius.

The reader also generally doesn’t see when and where you get stuck.

“Plotting vs Pantsing” is a common topic for conventions, writer workshops, etc. A “plotter” is one who outlines and works out their story ahead of writing it. “Pantsing” is “writing by the seat of your pants,” also known as making it up as you go along. The truth is there’s no pure way of doing this—writing almost always involves a little of both—and anyone who tells you there’s only one way to be a pro at this is telling you what works for them. For much of my career, I’ve been a “pantser,” because it’s how I like to write and because I feel drawn to the complete lack of dignity in that term.

Pantsing is how we got Good Intentions. I’ve talked before about how that book really isn’t the story I set out to write. Rachel originally sort of swerved between antagonist and ally, Lorelei was gonna claw back her personal empire, and the larger ensemble wasn’t even in my mind. I’m happier with what I got, obviously. But even Good Intentions came from a different sort of unseen change in my writing. At the time, I was several chapters into Poor Man’s Fight, and I got stuck and needed to write something else.

Where did I get stuck? I wasn’t sure if Einstein was enough of an asshole in basic training. That’s all. I wrestled for a long time with “how much of an asshole can he be before he gets thrown out, and is that asshole enough?” The answer was that he was already the right amount of asshole and I didn’t have to change anything. But that speed bump got me Good Intentions, and that story was the real start of my career. (Thanks, Einstein!)

Beginnings are usually the easier part for me. Figuring out those opening lines is hard, but I almost always know the kick off of a story. With PMF, I knew the climax beats to books 1 and 2 from the start, and had to work my way there, so I was “pantsing” in the middle. But Dead Man’s Debt had a lot more of that pantsing. It probably looks all planned out, and yeah I had some vague ideas, but so much of that was figured out as I went. Hell, I didn’t even really plan on Christina Walters being so significant at the end; she entered the book entirely because a friend said, “Hey, I want to be a bad guy in your book!” and I was like “okay.” Then the climax approached and I suddenly realized just how fitting and critical she would be.

But again: pure “pantsing” is rare, as is pure plotting. I don’t even know what purity means there. Often, I get about 30k words into a story and then wonder if I’m sure of where I’m going, so I do at least a kind of flimsy outline of where I’ve been and where I hope to go to track myself—but even then, it’s full of question marks. Even for the ending.

To combat all this uncertainty and make myself a little more productive, I’m trying to outline more and figure out the big stumbling blocks in advance. That’s its own trick, but I can do that work early and feel like it’s settled or I can keep on fretting through the whole production process. I have the next Poor Man’s Fight novel maybe half outlined, and I know the general arc but I’m wrestling with some big middle-plot break points (more significant than “how much of an asshole is Einstein?”). In the meantime I thought I’d get myself through the dumpster fire of 2020 with the space opera I’ve been sharing here… which I was mostly pantsing.

I figured Riley & Selene’s untitled story would be easier, because it felt very Good Intentions In Space and that first GI flowed easily. It has a less structured setting than PMF. I planned to happily lean into some clear tropes. As it turns out, this is all harder, and it’s not going in the directions I wanted. I expected this to be happier and sillier, and while it’s not grim or morose I’m struggling to make the humor work easily. I’m also struggling with plot beats and general productivity. At some point I worry about how long a book will take and if it’ll be worthwhile when it launches. People will read it, sure, but they’d be happy to read other things that might not take as long, y’know?

This is a long way of me saying I fully plan to continue and finish Riley & Selene’s story, but I’m probably gonna set it aside for a bit. Normally I wouldn’t even feel like explaining that at all except for how I’ve shared so much of it here already. I’m concerned about setting expectations only to put them off into a nebulous future.

(All this is why I’m not down with the complaints people have about writers “taking too long” on a book. I’m not even a Game of Thrones reader, but wow do I sympathize with GRRM on that one issue. It takes as long as it takes.)

What does this mean?

Mostly it means I’ve felt a big pull toward a different story I set aside a while back—again, in a sort of GI vein—and I’m looking at others. I’m figuring out more of that next PMF book. And over the weekend I got the next Wandering Monsters book much more than half-outlined, including the big story beats at the end that usually tend to be so much work. This one has a different sort of ending than the usual ensemble-vs-gobs-of-enemies climaxes I tend to do. I don’t have it all worked out yet, but I like it.

The answers to my problems with Riley & Selene will come sooner or later. If they hit me tomorrow, I’ll jump back on them. But I’m gonna figure out something I can work on in order to keep producing. And in the meantime, I’ll also have another short story here at the end of the month. For now, though, I think I’m switching my WIP plan from R&S specifically over to “whichever book looks like it’ll finish and launch fastest.”

Apologies if that’s disappointing to anyone who’s already invested, or who feels like the last few months of posts here are now out of step. That book will happen. So will others.

And as always, thank you so much for sticking with me here. This page and your support and interest did a LOT to get me through last year. Things are better now. I’ve just gotta sort out where to go next.

Comments

Kapelteta

I've enjoyed all if your work even if GI holds a special place as one of my favorites since all the way back when I found it on literotica. My opinion is write what is working for you, and I'll enjoy when it's ready. I didn't join up here for any one of your settings in particular. I enjoy them all, and I'm excited for anything you feel is ready to be shared.

Joshua Davenport

Thanks for the update! I enjoy your work so much, so thank you for putting it out there. The world can be hard on creativity with the *gestures at the world* out there, but I appreciate that you can keep doing it. Glad to be a small part of supporting you!

Vairya1

I really appreciate this look at the process you go through. It's a big confidence-booster for writers who worry that they "don't see clearly enough" or "don't have the knack for writing books." The fact that you produce the books you do from such varied beginnings is very encouraging. Other great writers I've followed have all said the same thing: there's no set process for writing their books. It's a bit different each time. I get the same vibe from you, and that's why I have total confidence that when your next book comes out, whichever one it is, it'll be awesome. Keep at it!

Mark Henderson

Thank you so much for sharing! While I love reading your works, the inspiration that I felt from reading this was wonderful - knowing that there isn't one set way, and that you don't have to "finish what you've started young man before you get up from that table." doesn't have to be the way things go. I know that I solve problems when I'm not actively thinking about them - many people do - so having the outlet of multiple story lines is important. We'll wait. We will wait, well because we have to, but more importantly, because we want to. From the pits of hell below to the stars and heaven above - and the humanity and inhumanity in between, we like, and probably more importantly, respect, what you do. Thanks!

Karl-Johan Norén

Thanks for the peek into the factory! And I note that even really good and experienced plotters (like David Drake) are not immune to getting stalled or fretting. Or that Lois Bujold said that nearly all of her books had a stretch of a "miserable muddle".

Dennis Erwin

I think there's a ton to be said for pantsing. From what I've read, one of the biggest, most successful plotters in the world today is Brandon Sanderson. I like his stuff and buy/read most of it, but it always has a bit of a... 'workmanlike' feel to it, with the result of me rarely re-reading them. I've re-read GI and PMF a dozen times - the charm of the writing totally overrides the fact that I know what happens next. Keep on doing what you're doing. I think it's been enormously successful.

RH

I refer to pantsing as winging it but all the same, it's a nice way to write. My anxiety often acts up when i overplot so it's nice to just...wing it. Seeing that GI came from the same place makes me feel better.

Jimi Kane

One can never be sure of how much of this is apocryphal myth-making, but the legend is that Aragorn appeared in the shadowy corners of the Prancing Pony without backstory or clearly defined purpose — Tolkien believed fervently that stories had a life of their own and Strider simply wandered into the narrative on his own. (Of course, another version indicates that Strider was originally a deformed and tortured hobbit named Trotter, so plainly epimethean plot refashioned the spontaneous pants at some point.)