Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Downloads

Content

Hi all, we're having issues with Apple Podcasts and the next episode of our Project 1933 is not showing up! Just to make sure people can access it, we're uploading it here as well! So sorry about this, we're working hard to figure out how to fix the issue!

There's also a Patreon Exclusive coming, of course -- hopefully we'll have that one edited and ready for you by the weekend! It'll be on Fatal Attraction and Susan Faludi's Backlash!

Comments

Valentine

I do still have more a sense that what is going on is distinctly Neo-Fichtean It’s not dystopian. Because Apartheid was Henrik Verwoerd introducing Fichtean policy to South Africa (Bantustans technically weren’t South African land) No body. No imagination. A political theory predicated on the developmental supremacy of particular nation states aiming at a stratified autarky - hence network cities by tech bros who happen to have grandparents close to or within the apartheid government.

kathleen

Pinkos, Feminists, Queers: In Other Words, Our Base is a t-shirt I would buy with a quickness.

Karen

Thank you so much for this series. So informative and helpful.

David in Brooklyn

Hello. Could you please make the previous "project 1933" episodes available to your Patreon subscribers? I don't see them listed here (below).

RFB

Moira - if you actually want to know more about the neo-paganism of the NSDAP then I suggest the book Hitler's Monsters by Eric Kurlander. I'll admit that it's not the easiest reading (partly the big words and the odd German word (thanks Adrian for saying volkisch a couple of times in this episode - I am pronouncing that correctly in my head); partly the fact that the underlying philosophies being explored make me very, very annoyed). I should also mention that I've only got to the end of section 1 (of 3) so far since starting it last weekend - there are limits to how much fascism I need each week!

In Bed With the Right

Yes, good idea! Will upload those here -- backdating is a little tricky on Patreon, but I think Mark will be able to figure it out!

OuijaFBabysMama

Pinkos feminists queers patreon levels is so lol love it

OuijaFBabysMama

@inbedwiththeright please do Caliban and the Witch by silvia federici. I just got to re framing of the invention of the cesarean section and its context within the historical transition to capitalism and the concomitant degredation of women and loss of value as a human being that women as a class experienced

OuijaFBabysMama

And it is blowing my mind. And I have worked in the field from a million perspectives for almost 20 years (?!?) and this is a relatively new way for me to even consider the cesarean as a way to save the life of fetus over the mother and what a historically huge issue that is. Prior to c section moms could likely survive many common reasons folks get c sections today such as breech presentation or shoulder dystocia (neither “necessitate” one necessarily) wherein a fetus could easily die and the mom be fine. However prior to modern life saving technologies… the c section is major abdominal surgery and I cant imagine many women survived the complications of sepsis etc in the fucking 16th century (fact check). My next question would be— is there a historical record that gives clues as to the original indications being considered as the purlose for thr c section? I know jot necessarily relevant to how a concept is digested culturally, but always so interesting tk find iut what was acrually happeneing dueing a sotuation tjat becomes a given (like that c sections save moms and babies! (Which is true! (But perhaps it was LESS true when it was invented than it actually is now so what does that ALSO say. Like what does it sah about us that for 200 years we had an intervention lauded that would absolutely kill a mom in exchange for a baby, as if interchangeable in value (of all meanings). Would love to hear you two fucking nerd perverts discuss