Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Gary Stevenson: The People's Economist (Patreon)

Published:
2025-05-04 00:04:39
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:

Downloads

  • Gary's Economics PF.mp3

Some files exceed the archive size limit and weren't saved: 1 file. Please note these limits are in place to keep this site running long term, without costing a fortune. You can favorite the creator though, certain milestones increase the limit.

Content

In this episode, Matt and Chris take a look at one of the UK’s most compelling economic crusaders: Gary Stevenson, aka Gary’s Economics. A millionaire trader turned YouTube firebrand, Gary’s message is simple and potent: wealth inequality is spiralling, the ultra-rich are hoarding everything, and economists and politicians are either complicit or clueless.

Gary’s story has all the trappings of a mythic arc: from humble East London roots to Citibank’s trading floor, where he made millions betting against the poor during the financial crisis. Now he claims the system is so broken that only someone like him, working class and mathematically gifted, someone who entered the high-power world of financial trading and took on the system, could see it. As Gary puts it, a sort of economic Copernicus, who brought a revolutionary message that was dismissed by a stultifying orthodoxy.

With his righteous critique comes a hefty dose of swagger, whether it is in considering himself like a Usain Bolt of trading or in the frequent laments about how exhausting it is to be a lone voice of truth facing bad-faith hit pieces. Gary straddles an odd tension: self-effacing underdog one moment, saviour-on-a-soapbox the next. He rails against academia, dismisses journalists as clickbait merchants, and urges people not to heed critics, due to their ulterior motives.

Our hosts explore the contradictions of a millionaire revolutionary who's not even bothered but also a bit miffed the phone isn’t ringing; a tireless advocate for the poor but also someone who seems to frequently drop in his elite credentials and just how rich he is.

So strap in for a deep dive into charisma, critique, and class warfare economics. Is Gary the economic truth-teller we need, or a populist guru-in-the-making with revolutionary zeal and a finely tuned YouTube brand?

Sources

Gary's Economics- Understand the Economy Part 3: Why is Inequality Ignored?

Gary's Economics- Signing off: how close are we to winning higher taxes on the rich?

Novara Media- Everything They Tell You About the Economy is WRONG | Aaron Meets Gary Stevenson

Financial Times: Gary Stevenson claims to have been the best trader in the world. His old colleagues disagree

Financial Times: He made millions betting against economic recovery. Now he wants to fix things

Daily Mail's hit piece on Gary

Reddit thread discussing Gary's Thesis

Plain Bagel - The Canadian Housing Crisis Explained

Patrick Boyle on the Pandemic Real Estate Bubble

Asianometry on an interesting historical case when radical appropriation of wealth worked

Economics Explained on the generational effects on wealth inequality

Anthony B. Atkinson - Inequality: What Can be Done? (Anthony focuses on numerous other strong measures, arguably more effective than a wealth tax)

Thomas Piketty - Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Stansbury, A., & Schultz, R. (2023). The economics profession’s socioeconomic diversity problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 207-230.

Comments

Matt Dear

I first heard about Gary when he was play formed by Armando Ianucci, for a short New Statesman podcast series. A little damning on Ianucci’s insight there maybe, kinda surprising given his pedigree in uk political satire. I watched a couple of Gary’s early videos, and did agree with the wealth tax on principle, and some of his ideas about how the economic system benefits the wealthy more than the poor in society. I didn’t really keep up with his videos though, as they were a bit one note, and I was a bit skeptical of his actual expertise with regards to economics as a whole, rather than just trading, and the sort of people who trade. I’d since seen some pretty good clips of him debating Tory wankers, and effectively wiping the floor with them by clearly explaining the material reality of working class and poverty line individuals. But, within about 20 minutes of this deep dive, I suspect it’d be damning, but I was shocked by how naked and naive his rhetoric really is. This is why I love DTG, I was giving Gary a pass because I agreed vaguely with his politics on initial impression. It makes me think of friends who have said they didn’t think Jordan Peterson was that bad, as they’d seen some clips and thought they were pretty good. It’s a good example of how your biases fill in the details of your opinion of someone, when in actuality you’ve not consumed much of their content, engaged with their ideas, or really analysed their position and what their motivation might be. Very interesting!

Shambles

Whilst on an economics vibe, would love to hear an episode on Jeffrey Sachs. A man with a cult following, white saviour complex, lack of moral compass and a love of the latest conspiracy theories...

Rakish Tilt 🎩

Oh, now that I've heard half of this Decoding it is clear that Gary is not a leftist but a liberal who is monetizing dissatisfaction with economic inequality.

Níall

The pause at 3:02 sounds like he was about to well up 😂

Herr K.

Great episode! He's a more informed early Russel Brand in his views, but with the rhetorical talent of Lex. I would bet against him following Brand's trajectory. The risk factors I see in Brand, and not in Gary, were conspiratorial thinking, scandalous personal life, and an audience that could easily make a MAGA turn.

Mike Nelson

Gary really doesn't seem to understand that all people have their own motivators and satisfiers, and for many of us, maximizing personal wealth is neither a motivator nor a satisfier. I come from a working poor family in the US and went to night school for 10 years while working full time to get my degree in anthropology. Maximizing personal wealth was not part of my decision process. I wanted to study something that I had a passion in. I am now in the comfortable middle class, by no means rich, but I like my life and have no regrets.

Damien

Brilliant episode. Matt mentioned London 80/90s "uncouth" traders - they were known colloquially as The Barrow Boys.

Kyle Dun

I had a chuckle to myself when Matt said, "Chris, we make a podcast, it's not hard is it." True Matt, not for you, who just shows up with your squeaky feckin' chair.

Tree

I dont think the Brand comparison is fair. Aside from there being so evidence/signs of Gary being a sex predator, he's not following political trends. Brand jumped on left wing stuff during Occupy. Gary is doing his thing during a (mostly) global far right turn. He's annoying as hell. But I dont think he's like Brand.

oh shizzzzz

Richard Wolff as a “Guru”? Or is he just an economist with a YouTube?

Lucy

What is the origin story of his YouTube channel? Did he supposedly decide on his own to start one? Is his appearance on the scene organic or more carefully planned?

Kit Zullasson

I hear the habitat of Bordeaux was working class but with good taste in wine.

CHUSSTERR

It got to the point where I laughed every time they said Gary.

AzurePropagation

God. Those cut-ins from Plain Bagel are such an incredible demonstration of the contrast between the two. Granted - it’s a small sample size, but having seen plenty of material from Plain Bagel, Patrick Boyle, etc - it really is so accurate to say that high information density channels basically never talk about themselves.

Eric Ireland

You've hit the nail on the head. I'd be thoroughly on board with Gary's crusade if he dropped the schtick about being the only person talking about inequality. He doesn't need to create a movement because there already is one: the Equality Trust. https://equalitytrust.org.uk/

Melinda

My tertiary qualification is physiotherapy, a degree I subsequently put to good use as a cop. But I digress, suffice to say I have no economics background (although straight A maths student in high school!), and even a dummy like me finds "tax the rich" a pretty bland suggestion. I think I have even come up with it myself! And, maybe I'm showing my age here, but isn't Thomas Piketty pretty well-known?

Mike

Tax the rich, You're poor because they're rich. I'm a genius and a hero, the only one who can save you. Give me your money.

Cee

Great decoding chaps, thanks! 👏 It left me with a very strong impression that Gary wants everyone - well, anyone as amazingly smart as him - to go work as traders in the City because that's the only way they'll get ahead. Does he really think that more people working as traders in the City is a pivotal step to reducing inequality?? Is anyone else smart enough to even be able to do this? I have questions Gary!!! 🤔

Kit Zullasson

I think you did a really good job here, decoders. There's some real value in demonstrating how to critique someone who supports a roughly similar political direction as yourself. Novara media e.g. is really bowing down to Gary in a way that I find offputting. If I may though one suggestion for the framing in the beginning: It sounds like you're being forced to clarify your own political stances in order to stave off lefty critiques. It seems to me though that this is just how thingd work best: It is good and necessary to clarify the political stuff and get it out of the way before you can get to how truthful someone presents themselves and the world. Would not be a waste of time to do that in the future where it seems advisable imo. Cheers!

Miles Curry

Frankly, and I’ve been thinking this for a few episodes now, but I think Ole Squeaky is unfairly targeted and deserves a more prominent role in DTG! His points are always relevant, though perhaps given at inopportune times AND he makes Matt more comfortable and less fidgety!

Kitchen Garage

So I get that he went to some very good schools, but what about his grades? Were they good?

Kevin Nyberg

I’m from the U.S. and do not speak the Queen’s English, so apologies if I misuse this term, but Gary sounds like a wanker.

Ollie

In the 80s they even had the term 'barrow boys' because there were so many working class people going into trading.

Jillian fon Swa

I can’t wrap my head around how stupid some of Gary’s points are. Like legitimately how does he have any following at all? He sounds like a 5-year old. The intellectual depth and rigor of his content is astoundingly shallow. And then he complains about being tired and brags about his wealth. So utterly dumbfounding that he has any listeners whatsoever. And that he really thinks he’s starting some sort of “movement?” What the fuck lol. He isn’t starting shit with his nonsense.

Nat J

Most of these gurus I’d never heard of before DTG. Never heard of Gary. Never heard of Lex. Never heard of Huberman. I’m not sure this podcast is actually salutary for my mental state.

Jen

Thanks for covering this guy. 💰

Chris Wishy

I studied some economics units back at uni. I remember stumping the teacher with a question about how an economic system based on growth works within a finite world. I also thought I was pretty clever for about 10 mins till I googled and realised that I hadn’t, surprisingly, been the first to ask this very obvious question. Gary (and listeners) should try Google sometime.

Andy

If you guys want to think about audience capture. just look at the percentage of comments here that are dissenting in any way.

Andy

So many of your arguments are pedantic, and miss the forest for the trees. Let me ask you, what do you think Gary's goals are in what he's doing? Let's start there.

Joshua

Garys life is basically Good Will Hunting except with economics. Underdog, overperforming genius from a rough upbringing. No tables, chair or bed, just a dirt floor and a dream.

CrystalJade

I still have a feeling that you need to zoom out. The discourse is self promotional, but would you expect anything else from a trader? The subject is one that seems different to pure economic models. Despite the economic debate it seems to me that there is a level of repression about how this knowledge affects (or perhaps does not affect) actual policy. Yes it’s some basic labour market economics with a sprinkle of conspiracism. However most people will never read or engage with IMF discourse or economic models. When politicians seek to blame people for being ill and on social security or for being migrants for economic difficulties, I can see a motivation beyond self-aggrandisement. I feel it’s great that this narrative is out there to encourage a critical view on the accuracy of these political narratives. I’m only half way through but felt motivated to comment.

Tree

I am getting very frustrated. I do actually think that Gary is trying to effect social change. (I think hes got a whole lot of other motivations too, but leaving that aside...). But this idea that you create social change by promoting one extremely simple message is wrong. It doesnt work. You either end up doing nothing or you end up creating monsters. Social change requires a lot of thought and a lot of work. People have to make alliances and that means compromise, but not too much compromise. It means working with people who are not like you and trying to see the world from their perspective. It requires fucking nuance and challenging yourself and others. And it requires giving shit up. Ive seen people make social change for the better. Like environmental reform that involved building partnerships between environmentalists, farmers, rednecks, bikies... Really diverse groups of people. Or someone I know who spent years in court while their partner was undergoing chemo trying to stop a thing. Then having to navigate repairing splits in the community that were deliberately engineered by the other side. And when people overdo the one simple message you get horrors. You get red terror or fascism. Social change is hard and I think whats annoying me most is that Gary and it seems a lot of people are accepting this one simple message crap.

aneladgam_varelse

I spend entire summer 2015 doing grassroot political party and campaigning on the street for higher taxation. My former party (polish party Razem) had in electoral program postulate of increasing taxes and progressive personal income tax 75% on income above 100k PLN. People lacked basic education how progressive tax work. People lacked basic understanding that public spending must come from somewhere and for that is needed higher income. People lacked other point of reference for equality than Soviet Union. People thought ultra rich got their wealth through hard work. People thought that country budget works just like home budget and the only solution for well prospering country is austerity. Finally there are very legit discussions about tax rates similar to confiscation and how that affects society, and today I think I would set 75% on income above 1.000.000/year, not above 100.000/year, if not 4m. Because people who earn 4m/year are professional class who earn too much money from companies that employ them and confiscation rate there is justified. Anyway bringing people on board to high taxation requires education and explaining how things work. I often heard in conversations that tax the rich is ultimate populism and everyone who isn’t rich will enthusiastically support it, but lol no, in reality these not rich people think of themselves as rational, down to earth, who can see through populism - and any activism pro-taxation needs first to establish itself as not populist movement to win hearts.

Monica B.

(I still have an hour or so left of the ep) One, I can’t get over him saying he didn’t have a table as a kid -_- There are kids with no tables in the world, but unless he time travelled back to some Dickensian era, given where he grew up, the dude had a table. The convo is also making me thinking about how there is a real issue between private sector jobs/public service jobs, and you can make a lot more money in the former (I work in the latter). Public sector workers are sometimes wooed by industry (who want things like deregulation, and sometimes industry bigwigs want in the public sector to deregulate from there, but that’s another issue). I imagine it might be the same in some academic areas? Like you said, not everyone who doesn’t pick the more moneyed path is already rich or somehow foolish! Anyway, I love an episode where I’ve never heard of the person! I hope he helps get the rich taxed (and I’m for the top 50% of earners paying more and am not afraid to get specific about it!), but damn, the ego is stroooong in this one.

Paul Ditta

I like Gary, but I have to concede the points made here. I would give Gary some leeway, when you’ve come from a poor background it doesn’t guarantee that money will be your primary motivation, but by god you don’t ever want to be poor again. He had a breakdown working in finance. It was never clear to me what broke him. I didn’t get the sense it was the perceived immorality of his position. It seemed more an extreme reaction to not fitting in, I think? I’m not qualified to opine. As for the money and the self aggrandisement. He’s an Essex boy, it’s basically in his contract.

Tim Tripp

Nice job guys. I have sympathy for Gary's views but he is a guru-ish and somewhat tiresome. I hope doesn't slide right but I think there is a risk he will. Lex is right, he is not very good as an interviewer, in fact he stinks.

Idan Ca

So the Copernicus bit hit hard… I’m cooking here in my kitchen and loudly exclaiming ‘what a fucking tool’ loudly to myself

Adam Sher

Here’s a comparison rattling around my head: Richard Hanania achieved through his writing and podcasts for anti-woke what Gary hopes to achieve for inequality but will not because he does’t offer a plan. Hanania also sought out engagement with anyone he thought was influential and always addressed their criticisms. It’s a playbook that needs some luck and won’t always work but it makes more sense than what Gary is doing.

Anonymous ethicist, not a serial killer at all, just asking questions.

Find myself agreeing with most of what gary says, but also finding him kind of annoying to listen to. Nothing to do with his accent or presentation, but he likes to repeat himself a lot. Watched his Unlearning economics interview last year and just had to turn it off after the first half, kind of talks in circles, even if i think he's right about a lot of it.

Trees

Matt, if you've got $10M to invest, I can guarantee you $200K per annum. I'm the world's best annuity trader. 😀 380 comments, new record?

Trees

Maybe there's more good in Gary's heart than the boys give him credit, but the guru behaviors are unmistakable, especially the narcissism. If he's building a movement where are the other voices? Where are the public actions, petitions, meetings with officials? Why is he not constantly featuring normal people to grow the movement?

Anon y mouse

@DtG / Chris - my in depth critique is up on Reddit now. Thanks.

Jimalim

Gary’s narrative is that he’s a millionaire because he’s a genius and his smarts allow him to cut through the Gordian Knot of inequality like no other. His working class background, his accent, his clothes are the glue that stops his narrative from falling apart; no one would be watching a posh millionaire ex-trader talk about inequality for hours on end. But the important bit is that he is a millionaire. He’s cosplaying a poor person building a movement from his kitchen table to challenge the elites. When in reality he is now part of the elite class, monetising content about inequality, looking to get himself a PA and someone to handle outreach (read his emails), paid out of the pockets of good old working class Patreon subscribers. The inequality advocacy is currently riding on the coattails of Gary’s media success. It might turn into something with teeth in the future, but it’s important to question how effective the net impact is right now. Especially if it’s just sucking up oxygen and not translating into meaningful action. I see that he had Ha-Joon Chang on his channel recently, and spoke at a rally with the Inequality Trust. That’s a positive sign, but it’s also counter to his claim that he’s on his own. Fact is, economists, think tanks, politicians could use his platform. When he gets back from his book tour I hope they get it.

Paul Bowman

Yeah, with Chris I think there are signs that Gary could shift rightwards at some point in the future. His narrative of how the smartest guys in the room (like him) prove their superiority by making money in the private sector, while academia and public sector economics is monopolised by privileged haters and lovers, is very Thatcherite/libertarian in its basic structure. And given that it lies at the centre of his sense of self-worth - a non-negotiable terrain for narcissists - he'll give up everything else before he abandons that. Plus the left are just much crapper at feeding narcissistic hunger than the right. It's why the direction of drift is so one way for narcissists like Brand (who has a similar cockney council house origin story to Gary)

Joanna Mulvaney

how did dr k end up in psychiatry residency placement? i have thoughts.

Joanna Mulvaney

yeah ok i concede that gary is trying to pass himself off as the rainman of economics with his disability being that he is from essex.

Louis Burke

Wait?! Almost everyone agrees house prices are too high? Is that supported by the evidence? My experience, from living in Ireland, is that there are whole cohorts of Irish society are very invested in the price of property being unaffordable.

Eve Wedderburn

Is there any way to gift an episode to someone? I would love to gift this episode to someone who is hook line and sinker for Gary and the whole "I'm the only person who can tell you this" stuff he runs alongside his potentially interesting politics is just pushing the person I would like to gift this to into ever deeper distrust of institutions. I am not a blind supporter of institutions or the political establishment myself but I feel so worried by the way this pushes people into diagonalist politics (which is I think we can all see now just a slide into the fascism everyone was too hesitant to name when the term diagonalist was being circulated a few years ago). Anyway yeah. Please can I gift this episode to someone who I know would never sign up to the pod himself