Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

Poll 112 Results, Poll 113 and This Week

  • Modern Armour Penetration 5
  • Modern Infantry Firepower 10
  • 2026-04-20
  • —2026-04-27
  • 15 votes
{'title': 'Poll 112 Results, Poll 113 and This Week', 'choices': [{'text': 'Modern Armour Penetration', 'votes': 5}, {'text': 'Modern Infantry Firepower', 'votes': 10}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2026, 4, 27, 7, 0, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2026, 4, 20, 8, 20, 48, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 15}

Content

Another win for WW2 Armour Penetration in Poll 112. At some point I suppose I am actually going to run out of things to poke holes in other things... while there's more variation in target armour, shooter units actually have a fairly limited list of main guns. Though I guess there's always scope for something weird.

This week I reckon we're back round to a Basics video. Again, there's a finite supply of topics... I feel like formations might be worth talking about though. There are some significant differences between real-life use of formations and CM use as well, so it should be interesting.

After that we should be back into the Platoon Patrol. My money is on the BMP-3s winning, but we'll see.

As for this week's poll, we're back to Moderns. Artillery Effects won last time, so we're just shooting stuff and poking holes in things.

Files

Comments

GLG

I had missed that in your recent Platoon Patrol scenarios that the mass of US troops were there for CM gameplay mechanic reasons and weren't even on the map. Compound that with the TAC AI electing to use ATGMs for area fire, which in turn forced the gunner to expose themselves to using the ATGM(and therefore get shot in the neck), and I think you have another possible video series on the horizon: how to game the game.